Skip to content

Comparison

ScreeningHub vs sanctions.io

Both are pure-play screening APIs with public pricing. The differences are in pricing model, ongoing monitoring, native AI-agent integration and decision UX.

TL;DR

sanctions.io sells annual API-call bundles (e.g. ~$899 for 5,000 calls). ScreeningHub sells monthly subscriptions with ongoing monitoring built in, plus a native MCP server for AI-agent integrations. If you have stable, predictable volume and prefer a one-shot annual bill, sanctions.io is straightforward. If you want monthly billing, automatic monitoring and an API designed to be called by both your services and your AI agents, ScreeningHub fits better.

Where sanctions.io is strong

Where ScreeningHub differs

Side-by-side

DimensionScreeningHubsanctions.io
Pricing modelMonthly subscriptionPre-paid annual bundle
Free tier100 / mo, no cardTrial only
Effective per-screen at scale≈ €0.013 (Growth)≈ $0.18 (Small bundle)
PEP coverageYes (incl. RCAs)Yes
Adverse mediaYes, categorisedYes
Ongoing monitoringBuilt-in (Growth+)Separate product
Pass / review / hit decisionYesMatch list, you decide
MCP for AI agentsNative
EU data residencyDefault on EnterpriseAvailable

Choose sanctions.io if…

Choose ScreeningHub if…

For background, see sanctions screening explained. Pricing is on the home page.

Try ScreeningHub free

100 free screens per month, no credit card. Run your evaluation set side-by-side.

Get started